The study revealed that the connection amongst the linear combinations from the 2 groups of parameters you will better become informed me of the one work through a good Remote controlled worth of
Towards the PSPP, four issues emerged, defined as bodily thinking-worth, football proficiency, health podpora upforit, real power, and you will glamorous body that have eigenvalues of just one.78, 4.34, step three.59, step three.46, and you will 6.08 respectively accounting to have 64% of your own variance among the many situations. In contrast to the fresh advised hierarchical design (Fox Corbin, 1989), yet not, this new real mind-well worth scale therefore the attractive human body subscale showed considerable basis convergence and you can was in fact next erased off next data. This foundation overlap between the glamorous looks and real thinking-well worth scales could have been stated somewhere else (Sonstroem ainsi que al., 1992). The remaining about three subscales out of physical care about-thinking taken into account 38% of your adaptation regarding the questionnaire issues. Cronbach (1951) alphas of these subscales was basically .ninety for sporting events competence (six products), .86 getting physical condition (six products), and .85 to possess actual strength (six items).
The latest POSQ plus shown a clear foundation build to possess interpretation. Two things came up which have eigenvalues higher than step one.00 and you can have been identified as activity (six factors) and pride positioning (6 activities) for get it done, accounting to have 34% and you will 21% of your variance inside participants’ answers, correspondingly. New interfactor relationship try negligible (roentgen = .04), in keeping with previous search (Benefits Roberts, 1994; Roberts Appreciate 1995) guaranteeing orthogonality of the two issues. Alpha coefficients was .71 and you will .90 for the task and you will ego positioning having do it subscales, respectively.
So you can have a look at brand new multivariate relationships within linear combination of the two groups of details composed of bodily care about-perceptions/goal orientations getting exercise, and you may indicator regarding inherent desire to possess do so, canonical correlation was performed
Brand new IMI including displayed a steady factor structure once the most of the points piled on the particular situations meeting minimal expectations getting chosen to own translation. Eigenvalues was basically higher than step one.00 to your appeal/pleasure (5 things), observed proficiency (4 things), effort/benefits (5 things), and pressure/tension (cuatro things) inherent inspiration subscales, respectively, accounting for sixty.1% of your difference on the affairs. Inner reliability coefficients had been .82 (interest/enjoyment), .77 (identified ability), .76 (effort/ importance), and .77 (tension/ pressure) towards the inherent motivation having take action subscales.
Function and you can simple deviations of the actual notice-feeling (PSPP), task and you may ego orientations to own exercise (POSQ), and you will inherent motivation having exercise (IMI) subscales try displayed inside the Dining table step one. Significant no acquisition correlations (2-tailed) was basically seen between activity positioning having do so and you will both attract/exhilaration (roentgen .29), and energy/pros (r = .36). Self-thinking out of health was basically relevant so you can attract/excitement (roentgen = .49), sensed competence (roentgen .59), effort/benefits (roentgen = .49), and you may pressure/pressure (r = -.27).
The brand new predictor parameters was in fact including self-thinking from sporting events competence, health, and you may real stamina, as well as task and ego orientations having do it. The latest criterion parameters contained the fresh four steps regarding inherent determination having do it, especially, interest/pleasure, observed competence, effort/pros, and you may pressure/stress.
74, F(4, 252) = ,p <.0001). Follow-up canonical correlation analysis indicated three significant functions emerged. However, only the first function exceeded the .30 criterion (10% of the variance) suggested as the minimal level for meaningful interpretation (Tabachnick Fidell, 1989). 68 ([R.sup.2]= .46). A minimal canonical loading of .30 is considered to contribute significantly to the multivariate relationship (Pedhazur, 1982). As Table 2 demonstrates, a high positive loading on physical condition, and moderately positive loadings on task orientation for exercise, sports competence, and physical strength, were positively associated to the criterion set of variables composed of interest/ enjoyment, perceived competence, and effort/importance, and were negatively relat ed to tension/pressure for exercise. Ego orientation for exercise, however, failed to significantly contribute to the multivariate relationship. The redundancy index revealed that 16% of the variance in the four indices of intrinsic motivation for exercise could be explained by the linear combination of the predictor variables. A redundancy value of 10% is recommended as a significant and meaningful cutoff for interpretation (Pedhazur, 1982).